![]() The whole machine felt slower – boot time was slower, and loading time was a little slower. Moving to LeopardĪfter wearing in the shoes of Tiger for a few months, I wiped the hard drive and did a fresh install of Leopard. PowerPC apps took a little longer to open, but we are comparing operating systems here, and not system architecture. Universal Binary apps screamed along, with the smaller ones opening in one or two bounces of the Dock icon. I even ran both on the same machine to give it a fair comparison: an Intel iMac Core Duo 1.83 GHz with 2 GB of RAM.Īs you might expect, Tiger (version 10.4.11) flew along. Then 10.5 Leopard came out with its fancy new features and power hungry visuals – but under the hood, in an everyday situation, how does it compare? Tiger became the longest running version of OS X, and I was wondering how Apple was going to top it. When Apple brought out 10.4 Tiger, it was amazing. Mac OS X 10.3 Panther was not the best edition, but it was definitely better than the previous ones. OS X 10.2 Jaguar was the first proper edition, but it still had a long way to go. Version 10.0 was a stab in the dark, and 10.1 made things a bit better. It took a long time for Apple to get OS X right. ![]() ![]() How does it compare to the legendary Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger? Progress We have had time to get used to Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |